(Bennett 59). You must have a duty code inside of mayan calendar research paper you or it will not come through in your actions otherwise. If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website. Kantians consider only the proposals for an action that occur to them and check that these proposals use no other as mere means (ONeill 413). In other words, humans are free rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for the enjoyment or happiness of another. . To use someone as a mere means is to involve them in a scheme of action to which they could not in principle consent (ONeill 412).
When data is scarce, Kantian theory offers more precision than utilitarianism because one can generally determine if somebody is being used as a mere means, even if the impact on human happiness is ambiguous. It is easier to determine an action as morally right in Kantian ethics than in utilitarian ethics. If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic. Kantians believe human life is valuable because humans are the bearers of rational life (ONeill 414). The problem with this, however, is that it could involve using people as mere means and may lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good. Contrastingly, utilitarianism compares all available acts and sees which has the best effects. A Simplified Account of Kants Ethics.